- Posted by Doyles
- On October 2, 2018
- 0 Comments
This case highlights the approach taken by the New South Wales Supreme Court in assessing which Construction Contract is in existence and binds the party in the situation whereby a Cost-Plus Contract is in existence, however the parties’ executed a lump sum contract some months later and backdated it to the date of the Cost-Plus Contract.
To download this Casewatch, please click the link below:
Casewatch-Stepanoski-v-Aslan.pdf (14 downloads)